
Marlon Samuels is back. Even before hitting a ball in a match, any match, the Jamaica selectors have called him into action, and after a disappointing day at Sabina Park his fans are ecstatic.
The right-handed batsman is right now in Florida representing Jamaica, and despite his long absence from the game, his fans are hoping that he will walk into the West Indies team for the Test matches against South Africa.
The return of Samuels, however, was not without controversy.
With Melbourne believing that the suspension was up on May 9 and welcoming back their star batsman at two Friday evening functions, with the media announcing his return to the game, Samuels was selected to represent Melbourne Kangaroos versus Kingston Tigers at Sabina Park last Saturday and Sunday (May 15 and 16), and the fans turned out to see their ‘big bat’ in action.
Samuels, however, did not play. The Jamaica Cricket Association (JCA) stepped in at the last minute and told the club that he could not play.
According to the JCA, in an email over the signature of its acting secretary, Ian Brown, and dated simply May 2010, in the email received by the club’s secretary, Rudolph Scott, at 4 p.m. on Friday (May 14), the JCA told the club that Samuels’ suspension ends on May, 16, 2010, not on May 9, and therefore he could not play.
talking point
That was the talking point all day Saturday at Sabina Park as fans, and especially those who had come to see Samuels in action, vented their feelings.
Without knowing the facts, or all the facts, some blamed Melbourne, some blamed the JCA, and some blamed the West Indies Cricket Board (WICB).
According to the manager of the Melbourne team, Donald McNaughton, he had sent an email to the JCA, to the cricket operations officer, Curtis Francis, on April 23 requesting that the JCA check with the WICB to find out when the ban on Samuels would be up and when he would be available to play, as he would like him to represent Melbourne in the Super League.
McNaughton received a response which said that “Marlon Samuels’ ban is up on May 9, thus he is eligible to represent Melbourne after that date in any competition under aegis of the JCA.”
McNaughton then sent another email to Francis asking when Melbourne could register Samuels and the immediate response was “seven days prior to the first match that he is eligible to play”.
McNaughton, in his own words, was shocked when he received a copy of the email sent to Scott on Friday, May 14.
There were other twists.
According to a few members of the JCA, Samuels was barred from playing because of the seven days rule on registration. In other words, the suspension was up on May 9, according to them, the registration could not have been made before May 10, and seven days from May 10 would take the date to May 17, which would have been the day after the match was completed.
nothing with the order
According to Paul Campbell, the president of the JCA, who was in Antigua at the time, the registration had nothing to do with the order stopping Samuels from playing in the match.
According to Campbell, he heard that Samuels was down to play against Kingston Tigers on the Friday. On the day before the match, he checked with Dr Ernest Hilaire, the board’s CEO, who told him that as far as he remembered the suspension ended on May 16. They checked it, May 16 was the date, and Campbell called his acting secretary and told him to send an email to Melbourne.
According to Campbell, the document he checked said that although the verdict came on May 9, the judgement was handed down on May 16, and as far as the ICC was concerned, that was the important date.
Based on articles written at the time of Samuels’ suspension, based, according to them, on documents in the possession of Samuels and Churchill Neita, the attorney who led his defence, and based on a number of references to the suspension in the media which spoke about the suspension being “effective from Friday, May 9″, I believed, like some members of the WICB, that the date was May 9.
I also believed that somewhere along the way, regardless of when the suspension was up, that the West Indies board, after getting the OK from the ICC, had to give the all-clear before Samuels could again take up his bat in an official match.
That was confirmed by West Indies board president Dr Julian Hunte, who informed me on Wednesday, May 19, that as far as the WICB and the ICC were concerned, the date the judgement was handed down was May 16, 2008, and the suspension therefore ended on May 16, 2010.
Dr Hunte also told me that according to the agreement the board of the suspended player must apply for permission for the player to return to the game, the board must supply reasons for its application, and the ICC must accept those reasons.
accepting the reasons
According to Dr Hunte, the West Indies board applied to the ICC for the reinstatement of Samuels on Monday, May 17, the day after the suspension was up, and the ICC replied on Tuesday, May 18, accepting the reasons given and welcoming Samuels back into the fold.
It was a very unfortunate situation, and the question is this: who should take the blame?
Before selecting its team, Melbourne not only sought confirmation re Samuels’ suspension from the JCA. It also did so days before and therefore cannot be blamed.
Should the JCA and the West Indies board share the blame?
If the West Indies board is correct, that as far as the board and the ICC are concerned the date was the May 16 and not May 9, then the board, headquarters in far away Antigua, should not share any of the blame, except probably in not informing the JCA, its affiliate, about the need to seek permission for Samuels’ return at the end of his suspension.
As far as the JCA is concerned, however, it is not so easy to absolve them - not after what went on in the week or two before the match at Sabina Park on May 15 and 16; not after all the radio, television, and newspaper interviews with Samuels about his return to the game; not when they must have known that Melbourne intended to play him; and not after an enquiry from the club’s cricket manager to the JCA was answered with an all-clear for Samuels to play.
To tell the club the day before, a few hours before the match, that Samuels was not eligible to play was far from satisfactory.
All’s well that ends well, however, and especially so as far as Samuels’ fans are concerned.
Samuels is not only back; he is back in style.
Samuels is now in Florida representing Jamaica, and despite what his fans may say, somebody up there, it seems, and especially so in Jamaica, obviously likes him.
Two years and more away from the game, more than 24 months without even trying to score a run, and Samuels is back in the Jamaica team - even before stroking a ball for Melbourne, even before the selectors have seen him stroke a ball, run a single, or even run around the field for a session or two in any match.
Maybe the present state of batting in the region, the embarrassing performance of the West Indies batting, and despite his record to date at the international level, the obvious talent of Marlon Samuels and the promising performances just before he was cut down are the reasons for the selectors’ haste in rolling out the red carpet instead of following the norm and allowing him to prove, in a couple of innings at the club level, that two years has not affected his timing, his ability to produce at the highest level. (Jamaica Gleaner)