ORDER NO. 2 - TO MOVE THE PASSING OF A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE COMPULSORY ACQUISITION OF LAND AT LOWER ESTATE TENANTRY, ST. GEORGE… NOVEMBER 1, 1994
Monday, May 10th, 2010 Mr. D. St. E. KELLMAN: Mr. Speaker, when one
listens to the members from the other side, one would get
the impression that this land acquisition started with them.
I want to quote here from a plan, the Barbados Plan
of Land at Lower Estate Tenantry and the date it was
certified which is April 30,1992. You are aware, Sir, that
the General Election was on September 6, 1994 and the
plan was actually recorded on October 6,1992. Seeing that
the House would not allow you to quote from something
without making it a document of the House, I would like
to make this plan a document of the House.
This Resolution dealing with this land acquisition is
really unique because it is the policy of the Democratic
Labour Party and we have stated this…
Asides.
Mr. D. St E. KELLMAN: We have stated this since
1980 that we had problems with the Freehold Tenantry Act.
The reason why we had problems with the Freehold
Tenantry Act is not because we did not want the tenants to
get the land, but in some cases you had a situation where
you are taking land from poor people and giving it to other
poor people. We strongly felt that the onus should have
been on the Government to provide the land for those poor
people so that you would not disenfranchise people from
property that they had for their children or their
grandchildren.
This acquisition at Lower Estate is unique. You have
a situation where the Democratic Labour Party acquired the
land and you are speaking about 109 plots. What we are
saying is that an acquisition like this we, under our rural
development plan, and you will hear of rural development
as if it is something new but the Democratic Labour Party
- that’s why you will not see it in our manifesto - because
it has always been a policy of ours and all we have been
doing is expanding on it
That is why we could have gone into St. George and
we could have developed a plan like this which is now a
document of the House and we could have put in roads,
electricity and all of those amenities. We are not talking
about a tenantry where you go and make it a plantation
tenantry, you put down line marks without any roads. You
have a unique situation here where you have all the
amenities you wanted and now you are inviting tenants to
come and enjoy the amenities.
I am saying that my friend, the Honourable Member
for St. James North has a good example of what rural
development is all about. It has been stated by the
Democratic Labour Party. He said it in St. Michael South
last night and on Tuesday last week he was told by the
Honourable Member for St. John that he would have made
my speech a policy speech, and he did it on Saturday, too,
Sir.
I am saying that once the Barbados Labour Party
planned to take our policies and introduce them like how
they are introducing this one today they will have no
problem from me. I will support this, Sir, because I realise
that they understand now what is the true role of a Minister
of Rural Development and they have acknowledged that we
had something good and they are prepared to accept what
we bad planned.
On the roads, Sir. This falls under the land acquisition
because leverage was given for that So I believe I can do
it also. We had planned that by 1995, and there is a plan in
the Ministry, that all the tenantry roads of Barbados would
have been completed. The Minister does not have to worry.
He has the leverage where he can go and fix all the
tenantry roads in Barbados and if anybody criticises him he
can easily say it was the policy of the Democratic Labour
Party and they are following our policy anyhow so he does
not have to worry. We will support him on that
I am also saying that in a development like this 1
would not like to see just houses I would like to see things
like playing fields. I believe there is enough land in
Government that there is enough other land that they can
use, where you can get a church and have some
commercial area because this is the type of rural
development that we in the Democratic Labour Party are…
When we talk about rural development we are talking
about rural development where you have all the amenities
and not just the housing aspect of it.
We are saying today that we will support the
Government on this issue and we have no problem with
this Resolution but we would also like to say that because
someone is prepared to name 23 roads and get up and say
that they will support the Minister, we hope that the
Minister will share the roads and he will not give them all
to one member. Thank you, Sir.





