BS&T SAGA
Monday, March 1st, 2010DENIS KELLMAN’S COLUMN- THE DEBATE
JULY 27, 2007
The present saga of BS&T should be a lesson for all developing countries and educational institutions. This is occurring at a time when Government is boasting of the increase intake at its tertiary institutions. This significant increase has occurred during the period 1994 to 2007 and has clearly shifted students who would normally be seeking work to continue their educational thrust in the hope of higher jobs. These students are led into an expectation that after completion of their studies that Government would create an atmosphere to better their lives.
Thirteen years later, we are seeing an expansion of qualified persons and a reduction in blue collar jobs. This process has occurred even though Government has been forewarned about creating an expectation that they could not fulfill.
This country has been fortunate to have a Government in the sixties that thoroughly understood what was needed to develop the country. This was why we developed our people from depending solely on agriculture and provide opportunities for Free Secondary Education for all at a time when developed countries were not thinking of such.
The DLP was so advanced in its philosophy that future Governments did not even understand how to make a small developing country, a developed country. For this reason, we saw capping of certain educational opportunities and the introduction of unemployment benefits using the wrong application. Too many persons believe that a negative can be corrected by a negative. That is why I would never agree with calls restraining the productive sector when the world economy is in recession. We have to understand that when the world is in recession, that we stand our best chance to take chances. We seem to believe that you can beat a man when he is strong.
The present problem that we have with the Chinese labour is a clear case of overheating the economy with construction projects which should have been planned to suit our labour market, instead of using the opportunity to rape the country of its offering without giving back returns.
Massive capital projects like the Four Winds Project should not be anti labour when one considers the concessions given by Government at the expense of locals. These investors must show their true intentions and should accept that the vision at the beginning will be used at all times to judge social conscience.
These projects should be judged by the treatment meted out to the William brothers, who were very accommodating in ensuring of the presence of Four Winds on the island. They were rewarded for their kindness by having steel imported in the island by persons whom they accommodated.
I have said before that Globalization is not for us, but about building a market share for the too few. This project is demonstrating that the only thing local will be the land, and one wonders why we continue to give up so much to accommodate these brands. I have always argued that we need to develop our own indigenous brands like Almond, etc. these brands are local in character and can easily be identified with country of origin whereas the other brands is so international that a reference to it means nothing to us.
As a country, we seem not to appreciate the acclamations given to us by our local brand and the importance of empowerment to these brands in preference to the foreign brands. I have said before that foreign investors and workers should be attracted to country by the way we treat local players. It is for this reason that I sought to introduce Kellmanomics which seems to be too kind to our own. We have enslaved ourselves for so long that we can only think external and anything internal must be punished. We have to wake up and see each other as equal players.
For years we have seen workers as a group that should have a limited amount of disposable income and we have used inflation and taxation to ensure that their upward mobility is engineered. This group responded by demonstrating their capacity by doing side jobs to counter the policies. We have now used international standards to deprive them of their opportunity to have choice by making their investments in stocks unprofitable through the usage of the Health Act and our full scale acceptance of globalization. This occurred when we accepted international standards. These standards were for countries dealing with international exports and we used them to deplete the investment opportunities of the masses by interfering with their “ stocks”.
Countries like Barbados have the capacity to save foreign exchange at a faster rate than other countries because of its capacity to earn foreign exchange from services. A closer look at this suggestion shows that the retention rate of foreign exchange is much greater than other foreign exchange inflows.
I previously said that Barbadians must develop the economy of their country. This development could be enhanced by our Caribbean partners after exhausting their moonlighting concept.
It is interesting to note that Mr. Barrow in the sixties was accused of the no cane blade speech after introducing Free Secondary Education. Forty one years after, the country is hardly able to supply its quota to its contractual market and sugar is now a net foreign exchange user because of its reliance on equipment.
One of the first orders of the day must be a meeting of the players in the manufacturing, agriculture and other auxiliary services. Too often these players do not understand the importance of control of a market and the importance of customs to the upkeep.
Barbadians should be proud of the PSV service providers in their aggressive approach to delivery. As a Government, we must ensure that their aggressiveness is done without interfering with others and the law. It is regrettable that their productive capacities are not practiced throughout the economy. The marketing capacities of fishermen are needed also. These economic players know how to use market demand to their advantage and over supply to their customers advantage. The press is fully utilized daily to ensure that the customers know where the best offerings are. These players know how to lower their prices to suit demand. This is evident, as in the case of flying fish which could start at $60 a hundred and end up at $25 by the end of the day.
The poultry industry is a privileged industry. It must ensure that the advantage given by import substitution is not abused and that consumer’s rights are protected. These players must ensure that they do not treat capital expenditure like revenue expenditure. Players in this sector need to understand the importance of being supported when demand is low and supply high. I have already asked the farmers in my area to study the marketing strategy of fishermen. They know how to dispose of their catches thereby pleasing both sides of the market.
Ploughing produce back in the ground or holding in cold storage is not in the best interest of the consumer or supplier. The fastest growing cost for businesses is electricity and one wonders why farmers would hold stock in cold storage instead of using market forces. The consumer must be respected and the suppliers must be supported first.
Too many persons believe that the consumer must continue to support their products in this Globalize market. Some do not even understand the power of shops and cannot appreciate their patriotic approach to local industry. Some prefer to ignore the wishes of their clients in order to satisfy the demands of their friends. This too few approach must be stopped or patriotic persons will likely be courted by the enemy. Our society is too important to allow persons to berate those of us who can do better. Such players offer a little and save a lot by getting permanent promotion with minimal costs.
Small businessmen must understand what is marketing and the value of marketing and demand their fair share. They must stop allowing persons from exploiting the advantage of their location a penny to get thousands worth of marketing for a token. These guys prey on you, but never see it as a business deal. They create the impression that only you gain and not them. The consumer is king and without him we do not have a business.
Last week I was invited to the Installation Service of the District Emergency Organisation at St. Lucy’s parish Church and the 41st Anniversary of Bethel Family Church. This weekend, the Bennetts Temple Church will be having a Fish Fry and we are imploring all to support these organizations in their efforts to look after the needy in our society. If we are to deal with poverty, the church is the best organization to offer fairness.
I was asked last week which side I am supporting in debate about BS&T and I was quick to reply that I will be supporting the company that can increase trade in Barbados. This issue is too big for anyone to think self. In light of everything that is occurring, the directors and shareholders should think twice about their planned decision. We all know the problem and should move swiftly to correct it and keep BS&T. BS&T must be seen as an independent and equal partner to the major players to put CARICOM on the World Market.
Peace, love, humility, Kellmanomics, wisdom and understanding.

Eligible passengers have additional options, such as selecting standby for an earlier or later flight, confirming a seat on an alternate flight or requesting an upgrade.

