LUCY IS SOMEBODY TOO
Monday, December 28th, 2009
DENIS KELLMAN’S COLUMN – THE DEBATE
SEPTEMBER 21, 2006
It is nice to be back in Barbados. Since leaving Barbados for Nigeria, South Korea and USA to attend various conferences, many things have happened. The major one was the passing of Roy Brathwaite, who cared so much for St. Lucy. It is only fitting that the complex that houses the St. Lucy’s Primary and Secondary School should be named, “The Roy Brathwaite Memorial Complex”. This will coincide with the correction that has to be made in the east where we have to make provision for rewarding persons without interfering with the history associated with the project.
This is why St. Clements School should be allowed to continue that great tradition and those persons who made it popular must be able to identify with it. The correction that has to be made in that area will be to name the complex after Mr. Ignatius Byer and the school to continue carrying the name of the Church. We have to be careful how we take the name of the church away to replace it with that of a man. It is regrettable that Lucy had to be the one to witness such change.
We have to be very careful how we allow outsiders to decide for us what we want when they cannot appreciate our needs. Lucy, her offsprings and only they can appreciate what she wants, all others just mess up the demographics, such as building chattel houses in an area where the people want house spots and want to develop them using the artisans of the area. We do not believe in piecemeal representation, but believe that all those who seek to represent our interest must show humility, wisdom, love, honesty, unity and understanding. These are qualities that are associated with Lucy and she has always demonstrated her appreciations for continuous love and not an ad hoc love.
The task ahead is great and the Government of the day must appreciate that Lucy is somebody too. I am still committed to the rebuilding of the two hotels that were closed down by the inappropriate action of the BLP. The offsprings of Lucy cannot be treated badly and at an appointed time, the goodies arrive and an offer is made for a one day feel good syndrome. The most independent people in the world can be found in Lucy’s territory.
The development that I have planned for St. Lucy is beyond the comprehension of others and will not only add to the independence of St. Lucy, but will make the north the second town of Barbados. Barbados will then become a fully developed country by correcting all the social and developmental problems now associated with it.
During my absence, it was suggested that a new concept of house building be introduced to Barbados a country that is foreign exchange starved. This concept is being introduces to a country that has a cement plant, builds its own blocks, produces its own grits and stones, and one that has an abundance of artisans and labourers. It is clear that the writer did not do what he is trained to so and that is he should have done an opportunity costs analysis before proposing that as a solution. The writer knows that his proposals run counter to the DLP’s policy and fits in with the BLP’s policy.
Barbados as a country needs to utilise its limited resources to the fullest and stop behaving as a country that does not have a foreign exchange problem. We must appreciate that we cannot solve the house problem by policies that make the Government looks good in the short term, but in the long term creates many economic and social problems.
This Government seems to have a problem when it relates to the development of St. Lucy and this is rather strange considering that in order for Speightstown to be developed as the second town, the development of St. Lucy must first occur.
This country’s leadership claims to have a connection with Nigeria, but they should have studied the Abuja’s approach to development. The Nigerian approach to development saw them appreciating that the development of their country had to do with the expansion of the country by developing a new town called Abuja, while at the same time maintaining Lagos.
This country has created serious problems for its citizens, due to the fact that development is not planned to solve the problems. Had we done proper planning, the Government of the day would have built Government offices in the north instead of extending Bridgetown to Warrens. Can you imagine what development would have occurred for Barbados had the Government taken my advice by building a multipurpose complex, a second hospital and a second airport in the north!
This Government does not appreciate real development and is only creating a feel good syndrome in situations where major capital works should take place. The flyover is another example of bad planning. This bad planning is further compounded by the extension of Bridgetown when there is a clear need for that development in the north. A good start would have been the construction of the complex for World Cup 2007 at North Stars.
The problem at QEH can only be solved by the construction of another hospital in the north. One has to understand that in order for proper maintenance to occur at the present hospital, floors must be made available for corrective work to be done in order to stop persons from becoming more ill by attending that hospital. QEH is sick and it is creating health problems for its patients.
It is clear that this Government does not understand the meaning of choice, and it seems not to appreciate what economic problems it will create for our country if something major occurs at our only airport. Unlike the Seaport, we cannot have planes on hold, while using alternative means of transporting passengers to our country.
It is clear that the BLP does not have a plan for the North, if they did, we would have solved all of our major traffic woes confronting the country. No development for St. Lucy means no development for Barbados.
It is evident that Sir Charles is still seen as if we are practicing localization, as he is seen as competing against his own in Barbados. This is not true anymore, and we have to understand that it is not a matter of COW versus Rayside, but versus Globalisation. This is a monster that will destroy our own if we do not cut out jealousy and be supportive of our home grown companies. I am here to represent all of my constituents. I am also free to praise or criticise them when the need is and vise versa.
Have we done a feasibility study to find out if the investment in Bridgetown would not have been better spent in the north?
Let us accept our past and build on it. If we try to do otherwise, we will end up destroying each other and the sharks would have no competition. Let us save Barbados by appreciating each other and working together for a better Barbados.
Peace, love, unity, honesty, humility, wisdom and understanding.




