GOVERNMENT SHOULD EXPLAIN THEIR ACTION
Wednesday, November 25th, 2009DENIS KELLMAN’S COLUMN – THE DEBATE
MAY 18, 2006
Politicians who believe that they can walk around making sport at others should have learnt a lesson this week when the Barbados Labour Party had to swallow their pride and bring a Bill to validate their action which should have been done since 1982. We could have behaved as they did in the early nineties when the DLP sought to validate their action after the fact, but within the one year stipulation. We were told then, that it was a criminal offence and innocent persons were misled into believing that only the DLP would have done such. The Social Justice Commission was called upon, the workers were made to march, along with their leaders in the various unions and the Private Sector joined with them and closed down the country, by retarding the economy, thereby creating down time.
This time around we did not have a bomb scare, an extremely short Order paper, but we did four items in their entirety without latitude by the lead speakers. The public is set to be educated by the Government of the real reason for the Motions. It was left to the Opposition to educate the public on these matters with the limited breathing space accorded by the Government. This Government seems to have forgotten that it is not for the Opposition to explain to the public their legislation and that it is for them to fully explain their actions.
The public is set to hear from the Government why it is that everybody is complaining about the switch from hotels to homes for the rich and famous. This was done at a time when the Government has diverted a large portion of its revenue to the sector, only to see a shift away from taxation by players in the sector. Such has occurred at a time when businesses have been converted to Capital Gains, depriving the government of recurrent revenue.
From early in the debate, I knew that something was fishy. Those persons who previously acknowledged with pleasure my temporary seating arrangement due to the absence of the Leader of the Opposition, who was away on business (these new founded B’s) were now trying to divert my attention from the work ahead by making accusations that I was being used and I should have acted by remaining seated six places down from the Speaker with no room for orderly communication.
I was told by a friend that it had more to do with the expectation of the speakers who found themselves one step further in the order, and now without future hope because of the action. These persons will do everything to keep this great party away from progress. These actions are sanctioned by persons who have forgotten that I have never being caught sulking when decisions went against me. I have fought for the party for 35 years in and out of Parliament.
My critics should know by now, that acting in that role is not new to me. It was done knowing full well that my status has not changed since 1994. It is not what your party can do for you, but what you can do for your party. These persons have forgotten the comparisons that were made after 2003, as they sought to match the team with the one after 1999. I guess that some of us have forgotten that it was said by the same persons that two were better than seven.
I have also been accused by some of my opponents as being puppet for the American Government and being a paid employee of its satellites. These individuals need to relive their lives and should ask the Lord in their re-incarnation to born them in St. Lucy. Such persons seem not to understand the importance of independence and pride, two values reinforced in every child brought up in St. Lucy’s territory, and if you doubt me ask Al Gilkes. At the same time, you should ask him about Lottie Griffith from Checker Hall.
These persons expect me to support a Government that travels the world making the point that they see nothing wrong with the price of oil even though it has caused many countries to give up their sovereignty by accepting offers that led them to breach their own internal arrangements. Venezuela has joined with other countries to bring small economies to their knees. After amassing large surpluses off the backs of poor nations, it is now doing what it knows best by entering the Caribbean with fairytale deals to impress those who have not seen them in action before. I have seen their hands already as it relates to their intervention in road and house building.
I have seen this Government paying for their breach, even though we were left holding the bag. When this matter came to Parliament, I argued against the compensation, because it was agreed by the previous Board of which I was a member at the time of the breach, that the board should file a suit against them, instead of them filing a suit against us. Politics has a way of not getting the best results because of political reasons.
Venezuela has starved small developing countries and is now seeking to heal them after placing them on the death bed. These nations are now being sought after by their accusers for saving their lives after being placed on their death beds. Why should we give up our Independence for a soft loan that will see us changing our foreign policy, that has allowed us to earn what we wanted? This is not acceptable, since it would stop us from earning to receive alms and soft favours. In the absence of our ability to earn, we would have no choice, but to be subservient to who, we have relinquished our Independence.
Peace, love, unity, humility, wisdom and understanding.






