TIME TO WAKE UP BARBADOS!
Thursday, October 8th, 2009
BARBADOS ADVOCATE – DENIS KELLMAN’S COLUMN - THE DEBATE
FEBRUARY 25, 2005
As a long standing member of the Democratic Labour Party, I am appreciative of the wisdom of the late great leader, Errol Walton Barrow. I am even more convinced that he was right in his approach to some of his comrades. These comrades displayed an attitude towards the upliftment of the masses and could not appreciate how a man, who was born in the middle of a cane field and part of shop life, yet appreciated the importance of uplifting the plight of the masses.
This appreciation can only be recognized by persons who had an opportunity to enter into dialogue at an early stage of their lives with the masses. Such persons were touched to see how the masses made requests of them as if they were not equals.
He did not use his position in life to belief that his family had the last piece of land or shop, but instead he used this experience internally and externally to try to work out an economic order to advance the progress of the masses.
This policy allowed the capitalist class to better manage their resources. This is consistent with the work that his uncle started in building the confidence of the masses.
The last few weeks have been very educational for me. We now know how selfish we are as a people, and that we are no longer our brothers’ keeper. We are now a people who are prepared to accept persons from outside and give them all types of concessions up front, yet would want to punish our own, even before they get the chance to produce.
If they are punished before they produce and are non-productive, who is to accept the blame for the country not being able to produce at its true capacity?
We have been told that the country has an economy based on services at the high end and that we need to better educate our people, a point I thought was accepted by all. The question that must be asked is whether the Governor of the Central Bank was the messenger or whether she was speaking based on foresight at the University of the West Indies on the same evening that the Prime Minister was speaking about the economic problems of Barbados. Who was the messenger and why two of the most important economic planners were competing for prime press coverage at the same time, or was one complimenting the other?
The Right Excellent Errol W. Barrow was criticized for advancing his position on what he would have accepted as the appropriate development of the country. He gave us free secondary education from the “womb to the tomb”.
We now see our country being able to export its people because of their educational base. At the same time, while the world appreciates our educational performance and is compensating us, some persons have decided that it would give too much credit to the Democratic Labour Party.
The multi-million dollar programme Called Edu-Tech has been found wanting, and a project that was once seen as a capital expenditure project is now rightfully seen as Revenue Expenditure for the school repairs and Capital Expenditure for the computers.
Edu-Tech has not delivered the goods promised by the Barbados Labour Party. The one that has worked and continues to work must pay the price for an ill conceived project that was supposed to take the spot light away from free secondary education.
The Right Excellent said that he wanted our economy to be structured around the Singapore model. To achieve this, he used the educational tools to start the social revolution for all. He did not even introduce a ‘means test’ to stop the rich or Whites from receiving free education, though it was thought by some that that they had the means to pay. Now the Government wants to charge fees across the board. Is education for the few elite? Or is it that some sends their children overseas and pay exorbitant fees, so all should pay? I used to hear people talking about kicking down the ladder and I thought it was figuratively, now I know that it is literally.
In the early nineties, the Government accepted its debt to the University of the West Indies, but never accepted that free secondary education should be put on the back burner. All of us knew that those times were hard. Some marched up and down Barbados and at no time could the private sector members rebel about their future staff members being deprived of an opportunity to get tertiary education.
Eleven years after, with the economy good, the private sector reporting surplus profits and workers complaining for increase disposable income, after holding strain for eleven years without the union getting the increases for their workers, the Government wants to extract fees from the students, whose parents held strain to ensure that the economy continues to grow.
The private sector must add its voice against these new impositions; the unions must remember what their members gave up over the last eleven years; and Professor Beckles must remember his commitment to make sure that at least one university graduate can be found in every home. He should not allow the short sightedness of Government to block his progressive vision.
Are we now working to make sure that Project Oasis can work? Or are we ready to give up Barbados to CSME and Globalisation, or are we ready to take over the world?
In the land of the blind, the one-eye man is King. Let us forget about Blue Peter Shark and focus on the Lion Shark.
(Denis Kellman is the Member of Parliament for St. Lucy, Barbados)


