Now lawyers catch protest bug
Friday, September 18th, 2009Written By: Alisha Ally
Bar Association president Andie George leads lawyers in an early morning protest around the courthouse.
They emerged from the Cathedral side of the High Court in Castries, black robes flowing in the wind and umbrellas tight in hand, leader at the forefront, silent as they made rounds on the compound. Clients sat upstairs, pacing, waiting for their cases to be called, initially unaware that the members of the Bar Association of St Lucia were circling the building downstairs, protesting the state of the justice system.Following the Chief Justice’s speech on Tuesday September 15 to open the New Law Year, the Bar Association held an impromptu meeting at the NIC Conference Centre; the venue used to mark the occasion. There was already unrest at the opening ceremony as members expressed dissatisfaction with the disorganization and break from tradition. This year saw the postponement of the formal proceedings to mark the opening of the new Law Year, until the situation at the High Court Registry has been rectified. No church service, no cases to be heard and no lawyers marching through the streets of Castries to commemorate with sister islands such a prestigious event.
One lawyer reported getting three emails about the opening, each just modified by a line or so and he was so confused as to what was going on and his role in it. It was only when he got there he discovered that the occasion was not formal and there was no need for the robe draped over his arm. He then realized he was supposed to sit, listen to the Chief Justice’s speech and then leave.
As the lawyers stood shoulder to shoulder behind the High Court building, Bar Association President, Andie George, spoke on the issues affecting his members.
A rare sight: Lawyers taking action against an even slower justice system as the problems of the courts are ignored by those in power.
“The closure of the High Court Registry, this grossly affects the administration of justice. This protest also marks the working conditions in totality. The lack of security in the courts, the lack of toilet facilities, the lack of facilities for persons that are physically impaired. It’s a whole lot of things. We want to make it known that we are tired with the inadequate facilities and the closure of the Registry which obviously affects the public and of course lawyers performing their duties.”In a media release sent on the afternoon of Wednesday September 15, George stated, “Access to justice cannot be treated as a collateral issue but as the pivot of democratic governance. Our legal institutions and the administration of justice must be strong and functional to avoid civil disobedience.”
Civil unrest breeds more civil unrest and the lawyers have not been the only ones protesting for this year and some groups have been successful. When asked his predictions on the outcome, George said: “I think the very fact that we are persons of some standing in society and it’s the first time we have taken this sort of action. I’ve spoken to more senior lawyers and lawyers have never had to resort to that sort of protest. I think it will send a strong message to persons who can make the changes.”
The Bar Association intends to pursue this form of protest until change is effected. A meeting was called for yesterday afternoon (September 16) by the Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Justice, Glenda Polius, allowing the relevant agencies to air their concerns.
George vehemently denies any political swing to the situation and said this protest is strictly about working conditions. “Our professionalism as lawyers is being affected because when the public pay us to do work, they expect it to be done in a timely manner and the closure of the registry affects our ability to do so.”
Protest action is always the last resort after all other avenues have been exhausted. George tells of the efforts made to have the situation addressed, not only now, but during the industrial action of June and July.
“There have been a number of communications and meetings prior to this protest and in fact, the members were getting frustrated at the fact that we kept having meetings and writing and nothing was being done. We wrote to the Attorney General in relation to conditions generally, not just the closure of the Registry. After the closure on the last occasion, June and July, we had a meeting with the prime minister and certain things were suggested but as far as we understand, nothing much has been done so we felt it necessary to take this action to be able to get at least the matters attended to immediately.”
The relationship between the Bar Association and the Attorney General’s Office is a strained one to say the least. Is the Bar Association protesting against the stewardship of current AG Dr Nicholas Frederick? “It’s not just the Attorney General, it’s the whole process. We find that perhaps the red tape in government takes too long to deal with matters of that nature. The Attorney General, in relation to the matters that we have brought to his attention, we felt that he has not dealt with them sufficiently, expeditiously. It’s the entire process. This is not a protest against the Attorney General only, it is a protest against the various administrations that have ignored the judicial process.”
Executive members of the Civil Service Association showed up at the High Court to publicly support the lawyers’ efforts. Sister Lilia Auguste spoke on behalf of the membership. “The CSA is here to express solidarity with the attorneys because what affects them also affects the workers that we represent. As you are aware we have had issues at the Civil Status Registry, the High Court Registry, the Registry of Companies, all related to conditions of work that is not helpful to the functioning of our members. So now that the lawyers have demonstrated their dissatisfaction, it also vindicates the position of the CSA.”
On the sidelines, some were in favour of the protest action. Clients in the High Court, when informed on the matter swung two ways; some stood in unity with the lawyers while majority didn’t really care what was going on.







