Archive for September 8th, 2009

Kenny gets his crowd!

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

Written By: Jason Sifflet

As far as numbers go this protest will go down in history as being a success but what now?

As far as numbers go this protest will go down in history as being a success but what now?

And when they up, they were up. And when they were down, they were down. But when they were only halfway up, they were neither up nor down.

This is the biggest demonstration ever in the history of St Lucia,” said Alva Baptiste once the marchers gathered at the Castries Market Steps.

Some on the sidelines scoffed. Thursday’s march was like Peter Jackson’s King Kong—a big budget Hollywood movie that went to number one and still failed to meet the expectations of the marketplace. While it was the most watched and talked about show in town, the audience wanted more. They wanted to see their friends, neighbours and their bosses out in the sea of red and black so that they could know that it was time for them to jump on the bandwagon too.

“It’s going to take a lot more than that to bring down the government,” one set of Flambeau whiskey drinkers said from the sidewalk outside their watering hole. “The demonstrations that brought down the Labour government in 1982 were much bigger than that.”

But a brief survey of people old enough to have marched in 1979 and 1982 confirmed that there was no such thing as a group of thousands in St Lucia back in the 1970s and 80s.

“Not even Calypso Finals used to have a thousand people back in 1979,” one well-known and committed non-partisan said. “Back then, if you could get 200 people, you had a successful protest action.”

Of course, the population has doubled since that time and so expectations are higher. So high, that the biggest demonstration in the history of the island didn’t exactly impress.

The best estimates of the day agree that there were about 2000 people actually marching on Thursday afternoon. It could have been 1700. It could have been 2300.

Philip J Pierre was the master of ceremonies and main performer from the beginning. Apart from leading the call and response chants, he also had to keep discipline.

“Flambeau!” he prompted.

“Must go!” the marchers responded.

“Flambeau!”

“Must go!”

The mantra was mind-numbing.

“Wait . . . back! back! back! back! Six rows! We cannot proceed if we do not keep the formation. Flambeau!”

“Must go!”

And so on and so forth. The messages on the placards were much more diverse.

The issues were like a litany of the current government’s missteps and wrongs including the Tuxedo Villas affair, the failure to pay pensions and allowances to the indigent, the ‘oil refinery’, health minister Richard Frederick’s villas, the IMF and a lot of ‘Youth In Crisis’ banners.

“We are marching for the teachers they call lazy,” Pierre preached. “We are marching for the civil servants who didn’t get the 7.5 percent. We are marching for the Labour Code. Do you want the Labour Code?”

As they crossed the Sans Souci bridge and came by government buildings, the march became a carnival. The marchers found a groove and were almost dancing and singing their slogans. They waved their old cardboard placards like Ole Mas players.

“The PM is a fortnight,” read one placard that could have been written by Tent Pinez legend Twa Ti Nay. “He 2 week.”

“I want some of de chip mauney,” another proclaimed, aping Guy Joseph’s IMF stance.

Civil servants who chose to stay at work abandoned what they were doing and came to the windows. Those who chose to demonstrate knew that there was no turning back now. The separation of the sheep from the goats had begun. The battle lines were drawn.

Justice minister Guy Mayers opened a window to get a better look at the people who were tired of his government. No sooner had he opened the window than 100 people pointed and shouted “Look Mayers!”

Without missing a beat, Pierre changed the chant to “Mayers!”

“Must go!”

Mayers chuckled seeming genuinely entertained with the idea of being the subject of a protest chant. He called on a clerk or secretary to bring him a camera. Within 30 seconds she was snapping away.

Passing the towers might have been nerve-wracking for those marchers who were just starting to overcome the culture of cowardice. But for seasoned demonstrators, who had not been to a march this good since George Odlum was cool, the real challenge lay ahead.

At the Jeremie Street junction, the opposition demonstration were confronted by the counter-demonstration. A group of loyal, faithful and hardcore Flambeau women stood on the corner ‘Under the Almond Tree’ where UWP supporters traditionally congregate to listen to Labour Party meetings on the Market Steps. Police officers in camouflage uniforms tensed up, hoping for the best and preparing for the worst. For a moment, the scene was tense. An incident where 2000 protesters ripped apart 20 counter-protesters was the last thing the cops needed in the news. A group of cameramen inadvertently stoked the flames. The more attention they gave the counter-demonstration, the more energetic it became. Some protesters fell out of line to see what all the shouting under the almond tree was about. Tempers flared and arguments ensued. Police officers started moving into strategic positions.

But a group of red-shirts formed a barrier between the demonstrators and counter-demonstrators. The moment passed quickly. Though the counter-demonstrators caught the media’s attention, most marchers never even knew they were there.

“That’s all the people?” said Yellow, a semi-famous United Workers Party operative, as the tail end of the demonstration went past him. “You mean to tell me Labour have a demonstration and that’s all the people they can bring from all around the island?” With his party in power, he found it easy to forget those dark days in 2001 when Flambeau meetings could barely muster 10 people.

“There are many more watching,” a woman standing nearby told him.

“Marching and watching are two different things,” Yellow noted, remembering that blood and sweat, not good intentions, are what helped keep his party alive in the worst of times.

“But there are people who are supporting just by watching,” the woman replied. “You think people were just passing by and stopped to see what’s happening? People attended the march. Even though they are not marching, the fact that they attended means something.”

“What does it mean? That they wanted to see who is marching and who is not marching?” Yellow retorted, perhaps giving his own intentions away.

“It means something is wrong with the country.”

All the way up Jeremie Street, the march left arguments and discussions like this in its wake. The spectators were divided into three groups: those who could never support Labour; those who were tired of the government but not so much for marching right now; and those who thought that the entire crop of current politicians should be lined up by the wharf with their hands and legs tied and then pushed into the dirty water, for the upliftment and benefit of all future generations. Few people watching the march circle from Jeremie Street, down the Chaussee onto Micoud Street could manage not to have strong feelings about it.

“March? What march?” a single mother said, quarreling with herself on the way to a bakery. “I have to make bom to feed my children. All of them have their big money. And I have to come and march? How is me, uh?”

“I’m red in smart,” said one sidewalk red-shirt, following without marching.

“I’m in mourning,” said a man in black, sitting on the Market Steps, waiting for the marchers to come back around for the meeting at the end of the march.

“They can march how they want,” said an older man, making his way home. “Marching doesn’t change governments. Elections change governments. And elections is two more years again.”

“I’m supporting, but I’m not marching,” said one sideliner, getting agreement from about six others near her. “A lot of the people watching are supporting. But people are working. They don’t want to be identified. They don’t want to have trouble at work tomorrow.”

On Micoud Street, a cheer rose up as Mario Michel came to the window of an office and smiled and waved to the crowd. They adored him as they never did when he was in office. In fact, back then, he was widely described as unlikable. Reporters urged him to come down, or at least open the window wider so they could get good shots. Michel waved his hand negatively. He was taking no part in this.

In front of the basilica, the marchers at the front waited for the rest to catch up. People were getting tired. But the sun was going down and the police were getting impatient. The last thing they wanted was protesters on Bridge Street at night. Some of the cops were old enough to remember Plywood City. The rest were old enough to be told.

The cops ordered the marchers at the front to move it along. Wayne Vitalis, former head honcho at the National Development Corporation and tried and true Kenny’s boy, protested. A light scuffle and heated argument ensued.

“Leave him alone! He has his rights! He has his rights!” the women holding the banner screamed at the camouflaged cops. The police, desperately outnumbered, backed off.

“It’s nothing, nothing at all,” said Vitalis as querulous reporters rushed to the scene, too late.

Tired, but energized by the near confrontation, the marchers turned on Bridge Street and like revelers on the last lap of Carnival Monday chipped their way back up Jeremie Street. It was over before they knew it. They did not lose. But they did not exactly win either. Their only consolation was that they had lived to dance another day.

Thursday’s march was the most watched and talked about show in town. But when people saw their friends, neighbours and bosses on the sidelines with them, it was a confirmation that the sidelines were the right place to be. This movie made money, but it didn’t rake in the kind of profits the studio needs.

“A lot of people are too busy working or trying to get work to protest,” said Ras Ipa, professional vendor and man on the street, on the reason more people weren’t there.

“You think when the bank is on your tail and you’re trying to keep your little business open you have time to think about strike?” said Gavin, a Castries businessman.

“A lot of people are afraid of victimization,” one of Kenny Anthony’s assistants had said before the march, preparing herself for hundreds rather than thousands of people.

But, like Franz Fanon said, the oppressor can only oppress with the consent of the oppressed. Or something like that. It wasn’t the culture of victimization keeping them from joining in, it was the culture of cowardice. And so the beat goes on.

TUESDAY’S SPECIAL IN MOON TOWN, BARBADOS

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

FIELD PEAS AND RICE; COU COU

MACARONI PIE; YAM PIE

BAKED PORK; BBQ CHICKEN

FRIED POT FISH; FRIED SNAPPER

GRILLED BARRACUDA

LAMB STEW; PLAIN GRAVY

PICKLED BANANA; TOSSED SALAD

New controversy with renaming of Mount Obama

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

Controversy continues to follow the renaming of Antigua and Barbuda’s highest peak to Mount Obama.

The decision to rename Boggy Peak after the first African-American president of the United States was not entirely embraced in some quarters.

Another issue has now emerged well over a month after the historic renaming, not here in Antigua and Barbuda though but in the United States.

Questions are being asked of congress woman Yvette Clarke as to whether she acted appropriately by accepting a trip to Antigua to be a part of the event.

The Washington Examiner in a piece printed on its Web site raised the issue and pointed to another electronic source, Legistorm, which expanded on the issue.

“Public records reveal a little ethical murkiness surrounding this renaming,” the examiner stated.

It said Clarke’s trip was paid for by the New York-based publicity firm PM Group, which has Antigua and Barbuda as one of its clients, as well as Jamaica, Anguilla and the Caribbean Tourism Organisation (CTO).

The examiner pointed out that congress people are prohibited from taking payments from foreign governments, which would include trips.

Legistorm, regarded as a great resource for congressional pay and travel data, makes out a stronger case for sanctions against Clarke.

“Clarke lists the expenses paid for the trip as only $241 per night, including meals. The cheapest room in Hermitage Bay, where she stayed, goes for $600 per night at this time of year for a single occupant. Clarke’s more generous rate appears to be close to the $200 rate the resort advertises for children,” Legistorm pointed out.

“The available evidence points to a government-sponsored trip.

“So it’s not clear why the House ethics committee gave its blessing,” the Web site further stated.

When contacted by the AntiguaSun, Ivor Jackson who heads the Mount Obama Committee, said he was not in a position to provide details.

“I do not have any details on that. That’s something I would have to look into,” Jackson told the SUN.

The Web site did point out that there is an exception to the foreign government travel prohibition.

It said it comes under the Mutual Education and Cultural Exchange Act, which allows foreign governments to pay for standing educational or cultural programmes blessed by the State Department. “But that law doesn’t apply to events like this one,” it said.

Grenada PM praised following release of prisoners

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

ST. GEORGE’S, Grenada – A Trinidad & Tobago defence lawyer has praised the Grenada government for not seeking to prevent the release of seven people convicted of murdering former prime minister Maurice Bishop in 1983.

Attorney Keith Scotland, who spearheaded the legal battle that resulted in the release of the so-called “Grenada 17″ over the last two years, said he was grateful that Prime Minister Tillman Thomas had allowed the law to take its course. “The prime minister has shown a legal acumen and a will to adhere to the spirit of what the Privy Council said,” said Scotland, who was among individuals at the Richmond Hill prison on Saturday when the prisoners, including Bernard Coard, the former deputy prime minister of the People’s Revolutionary government (PRG), were released.

Dominica PM promises universal health care by 2011

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

ROSEAU, Dominica – The Dominica government said it will provide universal health care for citizens by 2011.

Prime Minister Roosevelt Skerrit said several people have died because of inadequate health care for simple illnesses and that before 2005, “we did not have an intensive care unit at the hospital”.

“You can appreciate how many Dominicans have died because we did not have life support to give to them,” he told a public consultation at Dublanc, over the weekend.

He said the ruling Dominica Labour Party (DLP) government which would soon seek a fresh mandate from the population, would ensure that within a two-year period, all nationals would be entitled to universal health care as part of this administration’s strategy to improve the health sector.

“We have set ourselves a goal in the government that by 2011, we will have what we call universal access to health care in Dominica. This means that everyone of us will have access to some form of free access to health care,” he said.

The Dominican leader said government has been able to get an unprecedented number of individuals trained as doctors in Cuba and was examining strategies to deal with a shortage of nurses.

Bas: Just shameful

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

 

Shameful.This was how Opposition Leader Basdeo Panday described the 2009-2010 National Budge t, as he predicted that things would get worse for the people.

“It is the most shameless budget I have ever heard. She (Finance Minister Karen Nunez-Tesheira) regurgitated everything they have been regurgitating for the last seven years and, at the end of it all, you think anybody going to believe they are going to get water next year?” said Panday.

He was speaking to reporters following the delivery of the budget by Nunez-Tesheira in Parliament yesterday.

Panday slammed the Government for what he said was a lack of attention on the pressing issue of crime, and added that this was evidence that they were unable to do anything about the problem.

Panday further criticised the increase in penalties of road traffic laws.

Pointing to the low number of highway patrols, he said: “First you have to catch them. Have you seen any police on the highway? All of this empty wishful promises which they have been making for the past seven years. It is a shameful budget.”

Panday said the Government has squandered the national patrimony of oil and gas and now they are trying to earn revenue through “foolish” measures such as the increase in fines.

“I’m afraid things are going to get worse, not better, from what I have heard here this evening,” said Panday.

More taxes on alcohol, tobacco

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

 

Local manufacturers in the tobacco and alcohol industries were last night discussing what effect increased excise and import duties on tobacco and alcohol products would have on their businesses.

Last night, Jean-Pierre du Coudray, managing director of the West Indian Tobacco Company (Witco), said that he could not yet say what impact the new measure will have on pricing of tobacco products as “it’s a bit too early to say”.

He said he had been meeting with his management team to assess the implications.

Finance Minister Karen Nunez-Tesheira announced during the 2009/2010 budget presentation yesterday that government would increase the excise and import duty on tobacco products “of common market origin and the tobacco tax on extra regional tobacco products, all by 15 per cent”.

She said this measure is expected to “contribute an additional $30 million to government’s revenue and will take effect from today”.

She said the excise duty on locally manufactured rum, beer and other alcoholic beverages products will also be increased by 15 per cent. Additionally, the import duties “on rum, beer and other alcoholic products from extra regional sources will be increased by 30 per cent”. This measure will also take effect from today, Nunez-Tesheira said.

Derek Waddell, managing director of Carib Brewery Ltd, also said last night that he was meeting with his management to discuss the measure and could not yet say what implications it will have.

BIG FINES FOR DRIVERS $44.3b budget on US$55 oil price

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009
CONFIDENT: Minister of Finance Karen Nunez-Tesheira delivers the 2009/2010 budget in Parliament yesterday. -Photo: JERMAINE CRUICKSHANK

The lawless and the reckless, the drinker and the smoker, the homeowner and driver have been targeted in this year’s Budget to contribute to Government’s $7.7 billion revenue deficit.

But Finance Minister Karen Nunez-Tesheira’s second budget also shared the energy dividends across the income spectrum and makes significant overtures, even in a time of declining revenues, to the low and middle-income prospective homeowners, to small local contractors, to small business people as well as to manufacturers and property developers.

In her presentation of the $44.3 billion budget which lasted three hours and ten minutes, Nunez-Tesheira announced heavy penalties for lawbreakers. Those who overtake on the left side of the road and those who speed on the road would face increased fines from $200 to $1,000 and those who use the Priority Bus Route with impunity, without a pass, as well as those who have illegal tints would have to pay $2,000, up from $200. All these measures will be implemented from January 1, 2010. (See Page 5.)

And in a measure which is certain to raise land and building taxes, Nunez-Tesheira announced that the “antiquated, inefficient and inequitable” property tax regime (in which the last assessments of property dated back to 1945) would be replaced by a new “efficient, equitable and user-friendly property tax system”, in which the revised rates would be based on the annual rental value of a property.

In the case of residential, commercial and agricultural properties, the tax will be three per cent, five per cent and one per cent respectively, while industrial properties would attract a six per cent tax of the annual taxable value (which is based on six per cent of the installed cost of plant, machinery and associated buildings). For greater convenience these taxes however would be payable at banks, TTPost, T&TEC and WASA offices.

Government however continued to extend its generous benefits to HDC homeowners who would no longer have to pay legal fees attached to the purchase of any unit. And those prospective homeowners who have land and an annual household income between $24,000 and $50,000, would receive a Government subsidy of up to $50,000 to enable them to construct their first home where the construction cost does not exceed $195,000. For those with a household income of up to $75,000, a subsidy of up of $35,000 will be provided where the construction costs do not exceed $195,000.

Small contractors will enjoy a stimulus package in which Government would subcontract infrastructure works to them for building and refurbishing community centres, schools, police stations, health centres etc, providing a 30 per cent mobilisation fee (up from 10 per cent) to assist contractors in the initial purchase of materials and services.

Small business persons via NEDCO (National Entrepreneurship Development Company), will receive increased loan support. From October 1, first time applicants will receive up to $250,000 (from $100,000), second time applicants and third time applicants up to $350,000 and $500,000 (from $250,000).

The Minister announced tax concessions for “retooling” the manufacturing sector. She also said Government proposed to amend the Corporation Tax to allow approved property development companies to claim as a deduction 15 per cent of the capital expenditure incurred in the construction of commercial or industrial buildings which commenced on or after October 1, 2009 but are completed on or before December 31, 2014.

The Finance Minister continued the People’s National Movement tradition on sin taxes, imposing a 15 per cent increase in excise duty on locally manufactured and Common Market origin beer, rum and other alcoholic products and a 30 per cent increase in import duties on alcoholic products from extra regional sources. This measure takes effect from today.

The Budget is crafted in the context of projected real GDP growth of two per cent and a projected average inflation rate of seven per cent in 2009. The Budget is predicated on the “very conservative” oil price of US$55 and gas price of US$2.75 per million cubic feet. She said based on these assumptions total revenue was forecast at $36.6 billion. She added that on the expenditure side, Government intended to appropriate $36.9 billion from the Consolidated Fund while it estimates $9 billion in direct charges on the Consolidated Fund and expenditure under the Unemployment Levy Fund and Green Fund of $476 million. “After adjusting for repayment of capital and contributions to the Sinking Fund the total budgeted expenditure for 2010 is $44.3 billion. For fiscal 2010 the projected deficit is $7.7 billion or 5.3 per cent of GDP,” the Minister stated.

It was a more relaxed Nunez-Tesheira who presented the budget this time around. Apparently underlying much of her confidence and her budget statement was that the world recession would not last and also that the impact of the recession in this country was rather muted when compared to the region and the world. This was an outcome she attributed the Government’s prudent management and she patted Government heavily on the back for this.

The Opposition gave the Government its usual picong, saying things like “again” as Nunez-Tesheira announced many of the plans for this fiscal year. But the moment of the most thunderous table-thumping came when United National Congress MP Mickela Panday asked about gender policy and Prime Minister Patrick Manning rejoined: “Madame this is a Budget”, much to the delight of his members.

The Budget however does not appear to support the current thinking in many quarters that Prime Minister Manning is preparing to call an early election. There were no conspicuous vote-catching measures. Rather the 2009/2010 Budget seemed to be the continuation of the tendencies of the last six PNM Budgets.

Opposition Leader Basdeo Panday will deliver his reply at 10 a.m. on Friday.

Stocks rise after G-20 says stimulus stays

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

European and Asian stocks rose Monday after finance officials from 20 rich and developing countries pledged to keep in place their massive stimulus programmes to prop up the global economy.

News of corporate takeover activity, with Cadbury rejecting a US$16.7 billion takeover offer from Kraft, also helped stocks start the week well.

Wall Street was closed for the Labour Day holiday.

Germany’s DAX rose 77.80 points, or 1.4 per cent, to 5,462.23 while Britain’s FTSE 100 gained 64.47 points, or 1.3 per cent, to 4,916.17. France’s CAC-40 added 46.71, or 1.3 per cent, to 3,645.47.

Benchmark gains

Benchmarks in Japan, Hong Kong and China added about one per cent or more after Beijing said it would allow greater access to foreign investors.

In Hong Kong, the Hang Seng was up 1.5 per cent at 20,629.31. Shanghai’s main benchmark gained 0.7 per cent to 2,881.12.

Japan’s Nikkei 225 stock average added 133.83 points, or 1.3 per cent, to 10,320.94, snapping a three-day losing streak, and the dollar strengthened against the yen.

Positive reaction

Investors reacted positively to the weekend announcements from finance officials at the Group of 20 (G-20) summit in London, which acknowledged some improvements in economic growth but warned recovery was not sustainable without continued help from governments in the form of deficit spending, low interest rates and efforts to expand the money supply.

“It will come as a relief to markets that G-20 central bankers and finance ministers agreed that it was too early to begin withdrawing massive fiscal, monetary and financial support,” said Mitul Kotecha, analyst at Calyon.

Markets had been worried that nascent signs of economic recovery would lead countries to unwind their stimulus, but the G-20 dispelled those fears.

- AP

Venezuela’s Chavez hopes to work with Obama

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009
  Email To Friend    Print Version
By Mike Collett-White and Cindy Martin

VENICE, Italy (Reuters) — Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, a fierce critic of US foreign policy who once called George W. Bush “the devil,” said on Monday he hoped to be able to work more closely with President Barack Obama.

The leftist 55-year-old leader added in an interview in Italy that despite the global economic crisis and signs of a slowdown in growth in Venezuela, he did not expect his country to fall into recession.

Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez. AFP PHOTO

Chavez was in Venice for the world premiere of “South of the Border,” director Oliver Stone’s sympathetic portrait of a leader he says has championed the poor and who has been unfairly demonized by the US media.

“I have no reason to call him (Obama) the devil, and I hope that I am right,” Chavez told reporters in Venice.

“With Obama we can talk, we are almost from the same generation, one can’t deny that Obama is different (from Bush). He’s intelligent, he has good intentions and we have to help him.”

Stone’s documentary argues that the economy has grown under Chavez’s rule and poverty levels have fallen sharply, all without the help of bailout loans from foreign lenders.

Asked in an interview with Reuters whether the fact that Venezuela’s economy shrank for the first time in more than five years during the second quarter of 2009 could mean austerity measures ahead, Chavez replied:

“There is no recession in Venezuela. There has been a slight slowdown in growth but that is something logical because of the great worldwide recession in capitalism.

“We have taken some steps but unemployment continues to fall and production continues to rise. Venezuela has been affected by the crisis but has not and will not go into recession,” added the president, who sat next to Stone.

Chavez also said his democratic credentials remained intact despite concerns over moves to crack down on the independent media and political opposition.

Thousands of people took to the streets of Caracas over the weekend to voice their opposition to the president, who has been in power for a decade and says he needs another 10 years to pursue his socialist reforms.

“In Venezuela, no television channel has been closed despite the fact that in many cases the television channels supported a coup d’etat,” he said.

“Noam Chomsky … was asked in an interview what would happen if Fox News or CNN had supported a coup against a president. Chomsky replied that not only would those channels have been closed, but their owners would have been sent to the electric chair.

“I’m entirely dedicated to building a real democratic model in Venezuela. As Abraham Lincoln said, what is democracy? It is not the system by which a rich minority exploits the people. It is government by the people and for the people.”

Stone’s film includes clips of US news channels casting Chavez as a threat akin to that posed by al Qaeda.

“The caricature compares me to Hitler and Mussolini, that is just laughable,” he said. “It shows a lack of respect to the intelligence of the human being and of society.”